So, I had an interesting, uh, mini-conversation (it was like four or five sentences, tops) with a friend a few days ago about Helena Bonham Carter, and how I can manage to be a fan of hers given the whole Kenneth Branagh dust-up. My reasoning is that, while I’m extremely anti-cheating, it doesn’t really have much bearing on whether or not she’s a talented actress, and I think she is. Also, not that my friend was making this point, just that it occurred to me later, I’m not a fan of the school of thought that primarily blames “the other woman” or, more rarely, “the other man,” but doesn’t really place blame on the married person who cheated. Granted, bragging about it publicly, sort of rubbing it in Emma Thompson’s face is pretty heinous – but still, I’m not sure that entirely negates my enjoyment of her acting.
But anyway, my main point is, that this mini-convo was interesting and thought-provoking, and I’ve been considering it every day since, and in a burst of synchronicity, it kind of, sort of came up in class today. We’re reading Dead Souls, and I like it. And I like The Nose – or the summary of it, anyway, since I haven’t read it yet. And I’m seriously considering putting all of Gogol’s works that I haven’t read yet on the top of my to-read-next list. But in the introduction/editor’s foreword to my edition of Dead Souls, the editor notes that the original translator changed some references that were anti-Semitic, and the editor has decided to leave those references changed. (In other words, not “correct” them so they match the original text more closely, since that would be anti-Semitic.) 1-I agree with this decision, and 2-I didn’t like Gogol so much after that, but I didn’t stop reading. Today in class, we learned that Gogol wasn’t against the institution of serfdom. Apparently, alot of his contemporaries thought Dead Souls was some sort of argument against serf-holders, and I was under that impression, too. But apparently what Gogol is *really* criticizing, and what he *really* considered the problem with the serf system, is the serf-holder who isn’t properly exploiting his serfs. WTF. So, now I don’t know: do I keep reading Gogol? Anti-Semitic and totally cool with slavery? Kind of an asshole?
I feel like the HBC thing is more her private life, and I don’t feel pressured to boycott her films because she was the other woman once in her life. (And people make mistakes – I should go see if she ever apologized, actually.) I don’t condone it, but I don’t feel like it’s really any of my business. It’s more between her, Branagh, and Thompson. But Gogol’s shit is on a broader and grosser scale. But I am enjoying his writing, and at this point, what good will it do for me to boycott his books? He’s long dead, and most of us (at least I hope most of us) know that racism and slavery are heinous and inhumane and just fucking gross.
And then for the hat trick – something my sister, Susan, sent me today about Orson Scott Card. Now, I know Orson Scott Card is an asshole douchebag of the first water. I’ve known that for a while – my first boyfriend was really tight with two of Card’s kids (they all went to the same high school), and was obsessed with the whole Ender saga. (To this day, if someone is too enthusiastic about Ender and their identification with him, warning bells go off in my head. I mean, yeah, it’s a good read, but seriously, everyone who’s ever said to me, basically, “I am Ender” was a total entitled asshat. And given the crowd I ran with in high school, I actually heard that sentiment expressed ALOT. I was a tool, back then. I’m sorry.) Once I wised up and realized what a completely heinous and gross individual that boyfriend was, I started realizing that alot of his close friends and people he really looked up to, had similar gross, heinous, entitled, sexist, racist, classist, heterosexist, etc, worldviews. Birds of a feather, and all that. And then my mom used to send me clippings of Card’s articles from the Rhino Times (this little Greensboro circular), and, yeah, he’s an asshole. Anyway, Susan sent me this article of his whining about the Mormons getting blamed for Prop 8 passing. Now, a couple things:
1. While I might assume that strict Mormons are all pro-Prop-8, since that’s the official stance of their church (and if they’re strict, I think it’s fair to assume they agree with their church’s stances on stuff), I would never just up and be a dick to a Mormon about it out of the blue. That’s rude. Now, if Prop 8 comes up in conversation, and they’re talking about being pro-Prop-8, yeah, I might gently try to explain to them what a just goddamned mean-spirited and hateful stance that is. And then, if it gets a little rude, if we can’t just voice our opinions and respect our differences like adults, yeah, THEN I might actually say to their face, “Well, you’re an asshole.” Although more likely I wouldn’t, and would just find an excuse to leave and never talk to them again. (If you’re a friend/random stranger/blog reader reading this, and you’re pro-Prop-8, yeah, sorry, dude, I kind of totally think you’re an asshole. I can’t say it better than Keith Olbermann did, so here it is, why pro-Prop-8 automatically equals “you’re an asshole” in my book.)
2. While Card is correct that Mormon votes alone couldn’t have passed Prop 8, those votes *were* a part of it passing. What the fuck kind of dumbass logic is he using? “Don’t blame us because other people voted for it, too”? Well, those people are assholes, too. I mean, what the fuck is that shit? This is how voting works. You vote your conscience, and then you deal with the consequences. If you don’t want people to know how you voted and then give you shit about it because they disagree with you, maybe don’t be so fucking vocal about how you voted. Maybe keep that to yourself. But to say, “Yeah, I voted for Prop 8. But it’s not fair for you to call me an asshole even though you think pro-Prop-8 equals assholism.” I mean …. What? You have a right to your belief, and I have a right to disagree with you.
3. Card says, “If we had put out an ad showing gay activists forcing their views on unwilling citizens, it would have actually been true — since that is exactly what happened to make Prop. 8 necessary in the first place.” WHAT. THE. FUCK. Gay activists didn’t force anything on anyone. They did exactly what Card claims the Mormons were doing: “All we did was tell the truth, and try to persuade other people to act on that truth by voting for the proposition. We forced no one. We deceived no one. It was democracy.” All the marriage equality activists (because they’re not all gay, you fuckwit heterosexist) did was tell the truth, and try to persuade other people to act on that truth. And guess what, they did, and guess what else, that’s democracy. Here’s why my tolerance is severely chafed by people like this: because they whine and whine about “if we treated them like they’ve treated us” and “they claim we’re oppressing them, but really they’re oppressing us!” Shut the fuck up already, because no gay activists held people at gunpoint in the voting booths and made them vote for marriage equality when they were against it. And when you make the claim that these activists forced their views on *unwilling* citizens, then I just can’t listen to your bullshit any longer. Your other claims might actually be valid, but you’re undermining them with this “gay activists forced blah blah” shit.
4. Regardless, I’m still not going to be a dick to individual Mormons without sufficient provocation, because that’s just rude. I may totally disagree with them, but they have a right to their beliefs. But what I am ill about is how a tax-exempt organization is lobbying! Bullshit, Poppy, bullshit. (Petition for IRS to review the 501(c)(3) status of the Church of Latter-day Saints is here, if you’re so inclined.)
5ish. And then a side note about Card saying Prop 8 is “protecting marriage from a fatal redefinition.” Fatal? What? Like The Gays (gasp, pearl-clutching, hysterics, etc, all with tongue firmly in-cheek) are going to start getting married and then…Marriage dies? So, no one gets married anymore? Or marriages stop working? Because I’m pretty sure that me and Greg are still married, still fine with it in fact, and queers were getting married a couple years ago, and still are getting married in some (totally awesome, non-asshole) places. I mean, I haven’t lost anything – not a damn thing – because we let men marry men and women marry women. And actually, to be totally cheesy but also dead serious, I think I’ve *gained* quite a bit when marriage equality has been in effect. Little things, you know, like a couple sizes to my Grinch-like heart, or faith in mankind’s ability to progress and become better and more loving and tolerant, more of a sense of peaceful happiness about the state of things when I think about the world in general. “Fatal redefinition.” UGH.
Anyway, to return to my original point – Susan sent me that link, and it was another burst of synchronicity about this…I don’t know “morals-of-actress/author and my support as a fan” quandary. It’s not like I was going to read the new Ender book anyway. (Because, really, they should’ve stopped after Xenocide, and according to wikipedia, the series is now up to 10 novels, 10 short stories, and another novel in the works – he’s really milking this shit, ain’t he.) Now I’m *especially* not reading it, because I know where Card lives in Greensboro, I’ve seen his house (from the outside – but I had descriptions from that first boyfriend, who went there everyday for lunch), he’s already rich as fuck and doesn’t need anymore money from me, especially when he’s being such a damn dick.
This is long as fuck, and I’ve probably long passed the point where I, uh, made my point. I just got riled up. You know.